Prince Harry And Six Other Celebs Just Got Hit With A Β£34.5M Legal Bill β And They Have To Pay Β£9.5M By NEXT WEEK πΈβοΈ
The Duke of Sussex, Elton John, Liz Hurley and four others lost their privacy case against the Daily Mail β and now they're facing one of the most brutal legal bills in UK history. The judge did NOT hold back.
Stop everything, because Prince Harry's legal drama just got VERY expensive β and we're talking tens of millions of pounds expensive.
The Duke of Sussex and six other high-profile claimants are facing a legal bill of up to Β£34.5 million after losing their privacy case against the Daily Mail's publisher, Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL). According to BBC News, a High Court judge just imposed what's being called an "exceptional" costs order β and it's absolutely brutal.
The seven celebrities must pay an initial Β£9.54 million by Friday of next week. Yes, really. That's just the down payment.
Who's On The Hook?
The star-studded lineup of claimants includes:
- Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex
- Sir Elton John and his husband David Furnish
- Actress Liz Hurley
- Actress Sadie Frost
- Former Liberal Democrat deputy leader Sir Simon Hughes
- Racial justice campaigner Baroness Lawrence (whose son Stephen was murdered in 1993)
They all brought claims of unlawful information-gathering against the Daily Mail publisher, which ANL denied. On July 7, Judge Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed the entire case.
The Judge's Brutal Takedown
Here's where it gets messy. Justice Nicklin didn't just rule against them β he absolutely criticised how they presented their claims as "unreasonable to a high degree".
The judge said it was "striking" that "not a single allegation of serious wrongdoing was voluntarily withdrawn" by the group, even when they apparently no longer had evidence to back up their claims.
"Serious allegations of criminality or grave impropriety cannot properly be left hanging over individuals in that way," he wrote in his ruling. "The claimants' failure to do so was not ordinary forensic judgment... It was unreasonable to a high degree."
Ouch.
The Eye-Watering Numbers
The claimants had insurance to cover up to Β£16.2 million of Associated Newspapers' costs if they lost. But this ruling blows right through that ceiling β ANL spent Β£34.5 million defending itself, and now the judge says they can try to recover it all.
That means Harry and the others could be facing an additional bill of around Β£18 million on top of what their insurance covers.
Justice Nicklin did say he thought Β£34 million seemed "excessive" and raised "real concerns" about whether all those costs were reasonable. But β and this is a big but β he decided NOT to cap how much ANL could recover, saying it would be "too broad-brushed" and "vulnerable to the charge that it was arbitrary".
What Happens Next?
The duke and the other claimants have until October 2 to attempt to launch an appeal.
In a statement released Friday, Associated Newspapers called the ruling "a devastating critique of an attempt to destroy a newspaper and the reputations of its journalists, editors and executives". They are NOT playing around.
Sir Simon Hughes told the BBC he was "disappointed" and is now considering whether to appeal both the original judgment and the costs ruling.
Prince Harry and Baroness Lawrence previously released a joint statement after losing the case, calling it "a complete and obvious whitewash, but sadly not altogether unexpected".
The Timing Could Not Be Worse
This bombshell comes just days after BBC News reported that Prince Harry and Meghan announced their plan to return to the UK, with their children Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, enrolled to start school in September.
Talk about a welcome-home present nobody wanted. π¬
During the trial, dozens of people gave evidence including Prince Harry himself, who flew in from the US to attend court in person. Many current and former Associated Newspapers journalists and executives also gave evidence denying illegal activity.
The bottom line? This is one of the most expensive celebrity legal losses in recent UK history β and with a Β£9.5 million payment due in just seven days, the financial pressure is very, very real.
Do you think the claimants should appeal, or is it time to cut their losses? Sound off below. π
Sources:
Spill It π¬
0 commentsWhat do YOU think? Drop your hottest take below.
No comments yet π
Be the first to spill.